10 Comments

Thank you for this remarkable work. I will forward your piece to everyone and every group I know. You are correct in that if every young person voted it would certainly be a different world.

Expand full comment

Thank you Liz. I share the frustration of young people appalled at climate inaction, but then I think, wait a minute... your vote would take care of this! (not to mention ending citizens united, term limits for SCOTUS, student debt, fair taxing, gun regs, etc....)

Expand full comment

Amen, amen, AMEN! We've finally made more than a dent in the hearse that Big Oil drives, and it's a coterie of 70 year old women who've held the Fossilizers' Feet to the fire. Thank you so much for the heartening news on a very early Sunday morn in revisionist, recalcitrant, reactionary Naples, Florida.

Expand full comment

thank you Gerry. those plaintiffs deserve a standing ovation...

also, re Naples, I wrote it from blue bubble Oakland Park Florida!

Expand full comment

This is some reporting people will actually want to hear. Thanks Sabrina for always keeping things real, but also leaving room for the good in this world.

Expand full comment

We need to focus on climate realism.

The climate is changing, and we may have participated, but we don’t have a climate emergency.

The west should extract itself from the Climate emergency hoax and ban wind and solar and move as quickly as possible to nuclear via natural gas etc.

EVs are also a fantasy that should be defunded and taxed.

The focus should be on productivity and prosperity and some adaption to a naturally warming planet.

This will take strong leadership which so far is sadly lacking.

I base my position on the science and the impact of policy.

Its clear that as far as climate change is concerned its about 25 items down the list of things we should focus upon.

The climate change is mainly natural, and its mostly not us.

The whole climate emergency hoax is moving fast toward the danger zone of directing lifestyle choices.

How we travel, How we heat our homes, How we cook, What we eat…. very soon its going to mean population control!.

And all of it driving down prosperity with NetZero policies that clearly avoid any discussion against the false consensus, while many scientists dispute this “climate emergency” position and declare that the NetZero journey is unnecessary, technologically unattainable, and economically unviable.

We need to look at both sides of the scientific debate before we accept what we are being told by the media and governments and climate alarmists and before we get committed to unbalanced policies that will commit the next generation to low prosperity for no good reason.

More at… Take Back Manufacturing – Climate Realism (brainzmagazine.com)

https://www.brainzmagazine.com/post/take-back-manufacturing-climate-realism

Expand full comment

thank you, but I think I will rely on the opinion of 99.9% of the worlds climatologists.

Expand full comment

You are being badly fooled ... for example ..The IPCC scientific reports do NOT declare a significant issue that rates as an emergency... Its the political spin added by the Politically biased UN that gets attention.. Maybe get educated with this movie.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b18kAneSfM

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 12
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Here's a description of the youth case pending in Hawaii: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/hawaii-dot-must-face-kids-climate-lawsuit-judge-rules-2023-04-07/

Here’s a description of the government case vs private fossil fuel interests in Hawaii: https://climate.law.columbia.edu/news/march-2024-updates-climate-case-charts

Defendants in the LATTER case have a petition pending before the Supreme Court, which I did not make at all clear. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, I'll edit to clarify that there are (at least) two different cases pending.

Expand full comment

Send them back to school.

Expand full comment